Some public companies have groused that the Sarbanes-Oxley corporate-governance law has them thinking they ought to go private. Now some young companies say the same legislation is slowing their trip to stock market.At least it's given academics a whole new set of questions to examine (and write papers on).
Citing additional costs and requirements stemming from the 2002 law -- which, among other things, requires chief executives to sign off on financial statements -- some of these companies are taking private-equity money rather than opting for a fast initial public offering of stock. While they are still aiming for an eventual IPO, the companies are taking extra time to make sure their houses are in order.
The finance classroom meets the outside world (and vice-versa). Back away slowly from the computer with your hands up and your mind open, and with luck nobody gets hurt.
Thursday, March 31, 2005
Sarbanes-Oxley and the Law of Unintended Consequences (part 3,249)
Most legislators never learn about the Law of Unintended Consequences. As far as Sarbanes-Oxley goes, we've only just begun seeing the effects of this legislation on the capital markets. We already know that the increased costs associated with SOX have resulted in many companies choosing to go private. Now, it seems that these costs also affect the decision to go public (from the Wall Street Journal):
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
jordan shoes
supreme clothing
kevin durant
cheap jordans
kd shoes
bape official
yeezy
kyrie shoes
gap yeezy
bape
"Sarbanes-Oxley and the Law of Unintended Consequences part 3,249" deserves appreciation for its insightful analysis of the far-reaching effects of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Jiocinema Broadcast Uefa Champion League It highlights the importance of act.
Post a Comment