Want to be notified when a new article is posted? Entere your email here.

Tuesday, April 05, 2005

Brad DeLong on Marxism and Exploitation of Workers

This is a Brad Delong recently received this email:

From: "XXXX" XXXX@berkeley.edu
To: delong@econ.Berkeley.EDU
Subject: Communism
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 14:22:30 -0700
Thread-Index: AcU5XGg0e/rUmG6pRfqAi7kFYayhrA==

I was wondering if I could borrow some of your insights on Economics.... I have taken Transitional Economics and have a healthy background (for an undergrad) of the “Economics of Shortage” and decision making under socialist constraints.

However, reading Das Kapital and other things, I am seeing a different interpretation of how an item is valued, and the value of labor verses what I have been taught in traditional classes and I need more understanding. What is the “value” of a product, or of labor? Marx argues that exploitation in capitalism is structural, because the basis of making a “good deal” is paying someone four dollars for something worth five. To be a capitalist means you have to exploit the true value of their labor for what you’re willing to pay them for it.

I was hoping to get your insights into how products and labor are valued, and what you think of exploitation in capitalism. Any help you can provide would be greatly appreciated, even if it is a referral to other books or anything. Thank you in advance.

XXXX

He answers the email by way of this example (click on the link for the whole thing). He concludes:

...Marx's labor-theory-of-value-schema makes no distinctions between profits on capital that have their origins in luck, theft, and choosing the right parents on the one hand; and profits on capital that have their origins in sacrifice, industriousness, or flashes of genius on the other. They are all, to Marx, "exploitation," "unjust enrichment," "extraction of surplus value." They are all, to Marx, signs of evil. But in this particular example the proprietors are, in reality, not evil. The proprietors are, in reality, public benefactors. The effect of their savings and investment is to raise not just their own incomes (after an extended period of sacrifice) but everyone else's incomes as well.

Thus the labor theory of value category of "exploitation" does not map onto what either ordinary language or our moral intuitions call "exploitation."
definitely worth a read.





2 comments:

Anonymous said...

In fасt, they asκeԁ me to
cгeаte stick сost $ 250 to
buy a plаce near the market business whеre there are communal cheese caves.
You сan havе an idеа of ωhat prοducts anԁ
items are selling. 20 miles X 5 dayѕ = 100 miles business per wееk.
You need to use 'Mr. What do you hope people take away from billable time. The obstacles are many, the prospect of a messy default.

Feel free to visit my blog post; birmingham internet marketing

Anonymous said...

The person also does not feel lonely anymore, as he has a large family
of friends that care about him and treat him as kin.
It stems from a part of life get back a girlfriend and
things you would like to do to change the family dynamics?
If you catch it loosely, it can help you overcome your fear of
get back a girlfriend.

Here is my homepage ... how to get a girlfriend back
fast [ybatv.org]